Tuesday, January 31, 2006

THE “WHOLE” of the GOAL

I’ve been thinking about a lot of things lately as the calendar changed from 2005 - 2006. And it may be no surprise to learn (in this election year) that teamwork is one topic very ‘top of mind’ these days.

“The whole is greater than the sum of its parts.” This old bromide doesn’t mean that one hundred $1 bills are any more valuable than a single $100 bill; they aren’t. It’s meant to apply elsewhere.

$100 billBenjamin Franklin, one of America’s founding fathers (and the man whose face actually appears on the $100 bill), said, “We must indeed all hang together, or, most assuredly, we shall all hang separately.”

As a current example: a football team has eleven players. Though there are eleven people on a team, the value and ability of the team as a whole is much greater than the skill of each individual player simply multiplied by eleven. In fact, the greatest contribution a player can make is to cause the team to play better.

The late Vince Lombardi, championship NFL football coach, knew this principle inside and out. He said, “People who work together will win, whether it be against complex football defenses, or the problems of modern society … Individual commitment to a group effort — that is what makes a team work, a company work, a society work, a civilization work.”[1]

Unfortunately, though a coach may work tirelessly to get a team to play better together, the players don’t always care about the team.

Phil Jackson, NBA coach for the L.A. Lakers, former coach of the Chicago Bulls, said, “Despite their tremendous talent, [NBA players] are still, by and large, young adults, seeking validation from an authority figure, and there is no greater authority figure on a team than the coach. Needless to say, in today's warped, self-indulgent climate, too many players couldn't care less about appeasing the coach.”[2]

Clearly this sentiment also applies to the players’ perspective of the team, and this is a primary component of much of what is faltering in America right now.

No particular group has a definitive monopoly on this. It is a systemic cultural problem brought on by years of separating ourselves from each other.

If we apply the football team analogy to America, we could (for simplicity’s sake) have a team comprised of: atheists, blacks, Christians, Democrats, executives, farmers, Jews, Latinos, Muslims, Republicans, and whites—plus 50 other players on the sidelines, dressed and ready to take the field. But how well are we playing as a team? How effective are we at running the ball across the goal line? And who exactly is our opponent?

More often than not, it seems, especially with the players we’ve chosen here, that each member of America’s team may be more interested in how many yards he gained for himself today than how the team is playing as a whole, or how much time is left on the clock.

This isn’t an indictment; it’s an observation I had while reading a newspaper. And this example obviously isn’t practical; it’s representational. But now think of an office staff as a team; or a hospital staff of doctors and nurses; or the U.S. Congress. Now the players are much more closely identified with the example above.

Like it or not, we’re all in this together. If we continue to play the game separately, we’ll lose. Only when we band together will we continue to win, and enjoy one championship after another.

Ben Franklin was also the first president of the Pennsylvania Society for the Abolition of Slavery.[3] And more than two centuries ago he joined John Adams and Thomas Jefferson in recommending as our nation’s motto: E Pluribus Unum, which is Latin for ‘out of many, one’.

E Pluribus Unum remains our national motto to this day, appearing in the Great Seal of the United States.[4]Great Seal of the United States

[1] Source: www.vincelombardi.com
[2] Source: The Sporting News, Oct 28, 2005, by Sean Deveney
[3] America’s first abolitionist organization
[4] Officially adopted by the U.S. Congress on June 20, 1782

Wednesday, January 25, 2006

KUDOS to SHERIFF BROOKS!

I was honored a short time ago with an invitation to speak at a meeting of the Thousand Oaks Republican Women Federated - a wonderful group of people who care a lot about America. The theme of the evening was “Ronald Reagan’s Life and Legacy”: one of my favorite topics.

Also attending the event was Ventura County's Sheriff Bob Brooks. He was there, with his wife, to receive an award for outstanding service to the community.

Just following my speech, the Events Chair (and my good friend), Rosemary Licata, introduced Sheriff Brooks, and presented him with the award.

In thanking the group, Sheriff Brooks shared that he had recently been selected out of a nationwide pool of applicants in a highly competitive process to attend the Naval Postgraduate School's Center for Homeland Defense and Security (CHDS), an 18-month Master's Degree program in Monterey, California. Needless to say, everyone in the room cheered!

According to a press release on the Ventura County Sheriff’s Department website: “CHDS attendees are comprised of subject matter experts from the military, law enforcement, public health and fire services from across the country. The central mission of CHDS is to expand the capability of government to prevent and respond to terrorism.”

Sheriff Brooks certainly deserves this opportunity. For more than 30 years he has devoted his life to serving his community as a member of the Sheriff’s Department. I am grateful that all of us in southern California will, in turn, benefit from his knew experience, knowledge, and training.

It was an honor and a privilege to share the podium with him that night. I wish him only the best in this new endeavor.

Congratulations again, Sheriff Brooks!